Have you done similar tests using PTGui, that I gather makes more use of the GPU than Photoshop? Nvidia is following the pattern they've been using for many, many product cycles now. Resolve is going to be an interesting one since AMD usually performs very well for their price. The only thing different this time around is the terminology. Starting with the NVIDIA SUPER cards, they are a tiny faster than the "normal" versions, but it is by at most around 1% which is not going to be noticeable in the real world. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. IgorsLab overclocked a 5700XT to more than 2.1GHz, IgorsLab hit a wall at 1,800MHz on the core, AMD reveals Radeon RX 6800, 6800 XT, 6900 XT starting at $580, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. Nvidia RTX 2070 Super, AMD Radeon RX 6000 series: Everything you need to know, Sony PS5: Games, price, specs, release date, and more, Cheap Laptop Alert: This Lenovo Chromebook is only $169 today, Report: iMac powered by Apple Silicon could hit stores next year, This Seagate 2TB External Hard Drive is down to $53 — today only, Protect your privacy with the best cheap VPN deals for November 2020, How to recall an email in Gmail if you accidentally sent it, 15 problems with the MacBook Air and how to fix them, How to care for your laptop’s battery and extend its life, These are the best laser printer deals for November 2020, How to change your language in Google Chrome. I'm pretty sure Puget's comments were directly referencing CoreTek's same information, they just didn't go into all of the same technical how's and why's. Others have pushed the card even further, seeing overclocks as high as 2.3GHz. For latest tech news in your inbox, once a day! Arriving at seeing in 8-bit sooner than at 10-bit per color is pointless to me, since I would not be visualizing the end product. article is now available looking at PCIe Gen4 performance with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. In fact, in that case even the NVIDIA Titan RTX is only ~5% faster than the integrated graphics on the Core i9 9900K. Fortunately, third-party variants are far more capable, delivering cooler and quieter cards, and unlocking far more impressive overclocking. situation if you are already in the market for a new workstation or GPU upgrade. While the new NVIDIA SUPER cards are not noticeably faster than the "normal" versions, they are still faster than any of the AMD GPUs currently available, including the new Radeon RX 5700 XT. First of all, if you are choosing between AMD and NVIDIA for Photoshop, it is pretty obvious that NVIDIA has a clear advantage. Fortunately, there are ways around that limit. All of these parts are similar to the standard offerings but feature tuned clock speeds. Both cards perform well in our 3DMark Time Spy test. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). The 5700 XT has unrivaled power, so for a lot of people, it’s worth the $50. Looking forward to your test results in Resolve and other applications where GPU performance makes more of a difference. As for how this all affects real-world performance, we turn to our suite of benchmarks that we conducted during our initial review of the two cards. Really hoping for a real NVIDIA competitor in the video editing field that isn't an odd-ball product like the Radeon VII was. According to Apple again, the Radeon Pro 5000 graphics lineup from AMD delivers significant GPU performance gains over the last generation Vega offerings. If you really are that far out of touch with how the hardware companies are operating today, then you should either learn, or stop writing this type of nonsense entirely. To find out, we pitted the Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. RX 5700 in a one-on-one shootout. Don’t neglect your own research through some individual reviews because specific models provide superior cooling solutions. Photoshop and Premiere Pro do, but After Effects requires the use of a video monitoring card like a Blackmagic Decklink. That said, some buyers with high-end aftermarket cooling and some overclocking have managed to push their cards well north of 2GHz on a sustained basis. In the past, only the Radeon VII managed to beat NVIDIA in terms of total performance, so I'm interested to see if the 5700 XT keeps up as well. The AMD RX 5700 and 5700 XT are an exciting release from AMD. All rights reserved. In gaming tests, both cards prove to be very capable at both 1080p and 1440p, with more than playable frame rates (40-80FPS) at 4K in Fortnite, Battlefield 5, and Civilization VI. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than any of the calculated scores. The base clock is 150MHz higher on the 5700 XT. All rights reserved. It’s like getting to an approximate address faster in a Ferrari with no GPS help vs getting to the right address a little later in a Corolla with GPS help. At this point, the main value add for workstation cards like Quadro is the higher VRAM and slightly better reliability. The 5700 XT was able to keep level with the RTX 2060 Super and the Radeon VII, with the 5700 lagging behind by just over 10%. Too bad it's just another example of Adobe's total lack of software optimization for modern hardware. The crux of this comparison was always going to be down to performance. In previous years the refreshes were given the Ti moniker, but because they included the top of the line 2080 Ti at launch, they had to use something different, so we have the Super naming convention instead. What about the 5700XT ? Following are the performance metrics for reference: The new Apple iMac starts at $1799 US which is the price for the base variant configured with a 6 core, Intel Core i5 CPU, and AMD's Radeon Pro 5300 graphics. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. The performance numbers have been provided below for reference: On the GPU side, you will also be getting for configurations and all of them are from AMD. This does mean that the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT will not be able to utilize PCI-E 4.0, but we have an entire series of posts coming up that will be examining PCI-E 4.0 in professional apps like Photoshop. to try to figure it out. The benchmark we will be using is the latest release of our public Photoshop benchmark. I'm not 100% on that since we really don't sell Radeon cards (GeForce are faster at the same price points for the workflows we focus on), but I believe in order to get 10-bit display in an application like Photoshop, you would need either a Radeon Pro, GeForce, or Quadro card. Hey José, as of July 29, 2019 GeForce cards now support 10-bit displays: https://www.nvidia.com/en-u... . They've improved the performance generally quite a bit. From what I understood, 10 bpc is available for gaming cards but only in Windows and DirectX-based applications. To test each GPU, we will be using one of the fastest platforms currently available for Photoshop - most notably the Intel Core i9 9900K. Your choice will depend on whether you intend to invest in a BIOS flash to boost the RX 5700 for faster speed. The makers of PTGui recommend 4mB of RAM and as many cores in the GPU as possible. Evaluation of how well components available in Puget computers (CPU, GPU) can speed up such processing could be a very useful addition to the testing you have done for general Photoshop processing.. The 5700 XT has a sizeable uplift in TDP requirements, making it a greater candidate for aftermarket cooling, though could suggest there would be greater overclocking headroom on the 5700. To be fair, however, Photoshop is not exactly a GPU powerhouse. We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though … This confused us quite a bit at first, and we ended up re-running our benchmark multiple times, reinstalling drivers, etc. This was the best answer I could find: https://community.amd.com/t... , the official response from AMD was that the Radeon VII doesn't support 10-bit in apps like Photoshop and if that card doesn't, I highly doubt the 5700XT (which is much more gaming focused) does. Our goal is to provide most effective and reliable system possible so you can concentrate on your work and not worry about your computer. For a look at how these cards measure up to Nvidia’s new Super cards, check out our original RX 5700 XT and 5700 review, and our head-to-head comparison with the Nvidia RTX 2060 Super. AMD Intros Radeon Pro 5000 Graphics Lineup For Apple’s 27″ iMac – Radeon Pro 5700 XT With 16 GB Memory, 7.6 TFLOPs of Horsepower By Hassan Mujtaba Aug 4, 2020 13:49 EDT Things get more interesting when we look at the AMD cards. The 5700 XT was able to keep level with the RTX 2060 Super and the Radeon VII, with the 5700 lagging behind by just over 10%. For the privilege of the XT’s higher performance and curiously dented cooler shroud, you have to pay a $50 premium. Since we are interested in how these new cards compare to the previous generation, we will also be including in our testing the full line of NVIDIA GeForce RTX cards as well as the AMD Radeon Vega 64 and Radeon VII. Wow what a over reaction to a article not aimed at gpu buffs but rather photoshop users , and in that context it gave informative information as intended. In addition to the Radeon Pro 5000 series graphics, the newest Apple iMac also utilizes Intel's 10th Gen Core processors, featuring up to 10 cores & 20 threads for a significant performance boost over the previous generation iMac. Nonetheless there is still another hurdle. Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT & Radeon RX 6800 16 GB Reference Models Pictured. A BIOS flash will give you all the same overclocking headroom as a 5700 XT, just without the additional four compute units. Finally, both cards have identical configurations of GDDR6 video memory and bandwidth. That means you can take a 5700 and make it as fast as a 5700 XT using the right cooling. Considering its noticeably cheaper, that’s a fair result. No performance scaling with more CPU power or more GPU power in this application. For CPU, the Apple iMac (2020) will be featuring Intel's 10th Gen Comet Lake CPUs, all the way up to the 10 core part with 5 GHz boost clocks. There isn't much reason to use a higher-end NVIDIA GPU, and even if we only look at the tasks that utilize the GPU, there is only about a 10% advantage at most for using NVIDIA over AMD. We do want to point out that in our latest Photoshop CPU Roundup testing, the Ryzen 3900X was actually a touch faster than the i9 9900K, but we have had a few recent issues with that platform so we opted to stick with the tried and true i9 9900K for now. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB, RTX 3080 10GB & RTX 3090 24GB Review Roundup, V-Ray GPU Rendering - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, OctaneRender 2020 - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Redshift 3.0 - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Photoshop CC 2019: AMD Radeon VII 16GB Performance, Photoshop CC 2019: NVIDIA GeForce RTX Performance, Photoshop GPU Roundup: NVIDIA SUPER vs AMD RX 5700 XT.