This guidance should be observed by ESRC-funded researchers and ROs, and may be useful to other research-related audiences. Read the full article at UKRI publishes Gender Pay Gap Report. This document outlines the ESRC’s approach, aims and methods for maintaining high ethical standards in research in light of the new developments, while further clarifying issues that were unclear in the original framework. The Framework for Research Ethics sets out what the ESRC requires by way of ethics approval for the research it is asked to support, and sees as good practice for all social science research. The original principles, procedures and minimum standards have been retained. The ESRC committed then to a process of regular review to ensure the framework was kept up to date to reflect changing scientific agendas and policy developments. Research Ethics Committees in institutions have an important role in facilitating ethical research by sharing their expertise. The term 'research ethics' refers to the moral principles and actions guiding and shaping research from its inception through to completion, the dissemination of findings and the archiving, future use, sharing and linking of data.

The Framework therefore has implications for applicants to ESRC and their research teams, research organisations and research ethics committees, for those assessing research proposals and for research participants.

For the next phase of the review, we intend to make the information in the Framework more accessible by introducing an ethics toolkit that is expected to be added to our website in late 2015 and is intended to make the Framework information accessible in a more usable format.”. We welcome suggestions for case studies to add to our portfolio.

Ethical approvals often take longer than anticipated and can be a source of unanticipated delays. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), in facilitating innovative and high quality research, requires that the research it supports will be carried out to a high ethical standard. Ethics. If you would like to be involved in its development let us know. Our principles: researchers and research teams, Our expectations for research collaboration, Our policy and guidelines for good research conduct, Monitoring research and research ethics committees, Governance arrangements for research ethics committees, Our principles: research ethics committees, Criteria for research ethics committee review, Conflicts of interest, complaints and appeals, Research that may require full ethics review, Example research ethics initial checklist (DOCX, 50Kb), Example flowchart of ethics review process (PDF, 32Kb), Ethics review application forms and protocols. It is complementary to the policy and guidelines for good research conduct (external website), the Universities UK concordat to support research integrity and relevant guidance of professional societies and disciplinary bodies. The Framework for Research Ethics (FRE) is based on the Research Ethics Framework published in 2005. “As the principal funding agency for UK social science research, we require that the research we support is: designed and conducted in accordance with recognised best practice and ethical standards subject to proper professional and institutional oversight in terms of […] Is my research suitable for ESRC funding? Therefore there is a separate ESRC Committee that is fully compliant. 1 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 231 0 R /Resources 2 0 R /Contents 3 0 R /Thumb 147 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 841 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 595 841 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 2 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageC ] /Font << /F1 254 0 R >> /XObject << /Im4 257 0 R /Im6 258 0 R /Im11 4 0 R /Im12 126 0 R /Im13 5 0 R /Im14 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 267 0 R /GS2 265 0 R /GS3 268 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs6 240 0 R >> >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Length 10863 /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream Codes, guidelines, policies and standards, Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly, designed and conducted in accordance with recognised best practice and ethical standards, subject to proper professional and institutional oversight in terms of research governance. Monitoring research and research ethics committees, Governance arrangements for research ethics committees, Our principles: research ethics committees, Criteria for research ethics committee review, Conflicts of interest, complaints and appeals, Our principles: researchers and research teams, Our expectations for research collaboration, Research that may require full ethics review, Our policy and guidelines for good research conduct, Impact, innovation and interdisciplinarity, Intellectual assets and intellectual property, How to write a good research grant proposal, Inclusion of business, third sector or government co-investigators, Inclusion of international co-investigators on proposals, International Common Application Process (ICAP), policy and guidelines for good research conduct (external website), research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society and minimise risk and harm, the rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected, wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately informed, research should be conducted with integrity and transparency, lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined. The principal aim of the ethics review is, as far as possible, to protect all groups involved in research: participants, institutions, funders and researchers throughout the lifetime of the research and into the dissemination process. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), in facilitating innovative and high quality research, requires that the research it supports will be carried out to a high ethical standard.

New situations constantly emerge in the social science arena which require creative approaches to ethics issues. A summary of the changes is provided at Appendix E. In a fast moving research environment, new situations arise and new forms of research emerge which cannot all be covered within this document.

This ESRC framework for research ethics sets out good practice for social science research, detailing our principles and expectations from researchers, research organisations (ROs) and research ethics committees (RECs). The Framework for Research Ethics (FRE) is based on the Research Ethics Framework published in 2005.

This Committee reviews all research funded by the ESRC for which there is not a policy or legislative requirement for review by an NHS research ethics committee, or REC.

This guidance should be observed by ESRC-funded researchers and ROs, and may be useful to other research-related audiences. Such review exists to support the ethical aspects of high-quality research, to help researchers reach high standards, and to support and protect all the parties involved in research. Our case studies highlight some ethics issues encountered by our funded researchers.

If you would like to be involved in its development let us know.

independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of interest cannot be avoided they should be made explicit.

H��W�R��~��\J��{���v��`���vsA a��E�N�27y�tO�$�5Ʊ���>���x7z��J�wۑ�*������������8�?����_Ś���vH�H� �����֋�V��h ?���3#��uUM���IB����źNa�Vx�DJ�V��l��xse0��r�N!�?Ψ$P�T: research ethics. Whilst it is mandatory, The professional association for social work and social workers, Professional development, Professional Capabilities Framework (PCF), The Anti-Poverty Practice Guide for Social Work, IFSW and other international social work organisations, Influencing social work policy in the Commonwealth, Practice, policy and education groups (PPEGs), Coronavirus (COVID-19) guidance for Independents, Umbrella service companies & tax avoidance scheme investigations, Professional Capabilities Framework (PCF), Practice Educator Professional Standards (PEPS) 2020, Support for newly-qualified social workers, Professional Support Service: Access support, Professional Support Service: Frequently Asked Questions, Copyright © 2020 British Association of Social Workers.