And this isn’t just a 72W boost period, this is a long term limit of 72W. But, in AMD Ryzen 5 Vs Intel I7 which CPU series comes out on top? In key CPU+GPU workloads you can expect a 10 to 20 percent advantage to the AMD configuration. You can configure these systems to your liking, but for this review we're using the two closest configurations possible. Ryzen 4000 vs. Intel 10th-gen Gaming Battle, Intel Core i3 vs. You’ll need a dedicated GPU to run modern games like COD: Modern Warfare, Apex Legends, and Fortnite. What we were most interested in was to explore performance when the workload has a mixture of CPU and GPU utilization. In laptops with limited cooling capacity, it’s simply not possible to give the Intel CPU the power to normalize performance without making the system larger. This leads to some heatpipe layout differences, although the fans and heatsinks are the same. This isn’t a situation where Intel can simply raise the power limit to match AMD, as TongFang have also boosted the AMD part when designing these machines. Overall Winner: Between AMD Ryzen 5 Vs Intel I7 There’s no doubt that Intel’s i7 processors excel at gaming, but when it comes to productivity, and GPU support. Using a Core i7-10750H is a bit of an imbalance in configurations when the Core i7-10875H exists. TongFang have thought very carefully about how to get adequate airflow into the cooler, so there are huge vents directly over the fan intakes, open exhaust ports on three sides and even some ventilation over the heatpipes which you can see from the underside of the chassis. Here’s how the competition seems to be shaking out: Intel is playing its Tiger Lake cards pretty close to its chest, so there still isn’t a lot on the table. If you’re going for a budget build, but want the best performance possible, we’d recommend going for AMD’s Ryzen 5 series. Fortunately, AMD’s Ryzen 5 series does contain APUs. How To Make Your Laptop Faster For Gaming, 3 Accessories to Revolutionize your Laptop Gaming Experience, Unable to Update the Minecraft Native Launcher [Solved], Take Your Gaming to The Next Level With Unikrn UMode. More cores allow it to render things faster than the Intel i7 series, and with the help of its multi-threading capabilities make it more efficient while rendering and processing data. Intel’s i7 series may do a better job at streaming, but it can’t beat Ryzen 5 series CPUs at multitasking. On average, looking across our entire suite of productivity workloads, the AMD model comes out 19 percent faster. The AMD system did run slightly hotter on its reported sensor, at 90C versus 85C for the Intel model, however there are question marks over how comparable these numbers are, given they are from different types of sensor. That means Tiger Lake should actually run at higher clock speeds while using less power. Intel also greatly beefed up the graphics with Xe LP, a redesigned core that should offer nearly double the performance of 10th-gen Ice lake’s graphics. Core i7 vs. But what we saw in today's review is exactly how that difference translates to real world devices for productivity workloads with an otherwise identical configuration. If you indeed need an 8-core powerhouse in a sub-three-pound laptop, your only choice will have the AMD logo on it. XMG Core 15 By Tim Schiesser on August 13, 2020 Most Read. The AMD-based Core 15 also features DDR4-3200, meeting AMD’s memory spec. Winner: Intel’s i7 series. The AMD system in comparison, takes just 43 minutes to encode the video, and finishes with 38% of its battery remaining. It also dances all over Intel’s 10nm, 10th-gen Ice Lake chips. At the end of the day, we already knew that AMD’s Ryzen 7 4800H is faster than a Core i7-10750H under stock conditions. Initial Tiger Lake laptops will not support but it's expected to show next year. The ringer in all this is Tiger Lake’s eventual support for LPDDR5/5400 and LPDDR4X/4267 memory. For two-pass encodes, which are CPU-only, the AMD system held a 30 percent advantage, so if you want to up the quality of your exports, the margin will only grow in favor of AMD. Sorry Intel fans, there’s a new champion. Although, Ryzen CPUs have their own graphics technology. Both designs have direct cooling for both GPU and CPU VRMs, as cooling these components is very important. In Excel, the 4800H model is 8 percent faster, and in MATLAB it’s 7 percent faster. Although Intel may do a slightly good job at streaming, the Ryzen 5 series is much better at things like video-editing and graphics-designing. For the single-core performance that applies to most mainstream applications, Tiger Lake has a chance to punch back. The AMD model has the APU and RAM on the left, with the GPU on the right. You’ll also want the Ryzen model for code compilation. In our Cygwin compile, the AMD system pulled ahead by a significant 42 percent. The fact that it even saves you some money should seal the deal. The internal layout for each model is largely the same in terms of peripheral locations: all the I/O, SSDs, battery, Wi-Fi card and fans are in the same location. Core i9, Ryzen 3 vs. Ryzen 5 vs. Ryzen 7 vs. Ryzen 9, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. This is what XMG told us: "this is due to the higher power efficiency of the AMD CPU – it leaves more headroom for GPU boost.". Can AMD take advantage of higher efficiency? In a follow up piece we’ll dive into gaming performance with this design (part 2 is now live). While these laptops are built from the same fundamental platform, as you might expect there are considerations made to optimize for AMD and Intel processors. XMG have branded this laptop as the Core 15, but you may have also seen it as the Eluktronics RP-15, among others. © 2020 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Now that Intel’s finally announced its new Tiger Lake CPU for laptops Thursday morning, we can finally start making the odds on which chip will win: 11th-gen Tiger Lake or AMD Ryzen 4000. AMD’s Ryzen 4000 “Matisse” has reset the laptop landscape unlike any other CPU in years. In today’s review we’ll be covering productivity performance, a look at thermals, and battery life. XMG primarily sells into the European market. The BOE panel has full sRGB coverage and good response times, which make it well suited to both gaming and content creation. Although, Intel’s i7 processors may be the best choice for gaming-only. The rivalry between the two is one of the greatest debates for PC enthusiasts. You've seen the results of our numerous tests of Intel 10th-gen Core laptops as well as for AMD equipped models using Ryzen 4800H and 4900HS CPUs. When XMG ships these systems they will be configured with 62Wh cells instead. So here we have the XMG Core 15, featuring the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H or the Intel Core i7-10750H. When using the Overboost mode, the CPU runs at up to 72W, the first time we’ve seen a Ryzen laptop exceed the rated TDP range AMD specifies. Ryzen 7 4000U is about equal to and sometimes faster than Intel’s 10th-gen Ice Lake U chips, but Intel could regain advantage thanks to the SuperFin and higher clocks in Tiger Lake U. Intel’s argument is that you don’t need all of those cores in a tiny 13-inch laptop. AMD does not have the greatest record as a laptop CPU provider, even with previous Ryzen generations, those systems were just ok and Intel was the superior choice. Note: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Both companies make compelling products and have different advantages. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. On the Intel side, the Core i7-10750H can be run up to 75W, so slightly higher than the AMD model. What was most interesting is to compare battery life and performance when running our Handbrake workload on battery. As fan noise is the same and neither system throttles, and package power was also within 3W for both models, there is no real world thermal system advantage for either model.