Sure, there are some cases once again where each card is pretty much identical in speed, but it’s still the RTX 2080 that comes out on top overall, even if sometimes it’s only by a couple of frames. AMD’s high-end gaming GPU has been spotted across the UL 3DMark benchmarking suite, that means we have access to early results for Firestrike, Firestrike Extreme, Firestrike Ultra, and Time Spy. Highlighting VII’s gaming focus is likely for marketing more than anything else, because “world’s first 7nm jack-of-all-trades card” doesn’t have the same ring to it. The only game where the Radeon 7 actually comes out on top is Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, where its average benchmark score was just a single frame in front of its Nvidia rival. See what I mean? To stay up to date with the latest PC gaming guides, news, and reviews, follow PCGamesN on Twitter and Steam News Hub. It does topple the GTX 1080 Ti, which scores 25,472, and AMD’s Vega 64 with 22,703. But, for the record, at 1440p standard quality, the Radeon VII manages to sit right under the GTX 1080 Ti, while at high it only just tops a GTX 980 Ti. Catering to both enthusiasts and businesses alike; from desktop gaming to professional workstations, and all the supporting software. Comments are now closed. In most cases, each configuration is tested twice, with more runs added if the initial results make the extra testing necessary (which isn’t required too often). Jacob Ridley That even includes 1080p resolution. Magic: The Gathering gifting guide – the perfect gifts for you or loved ones, Lockdown magic – how to introduce your household to Magic: The Gathering, How D&D helped people keep friendships alive during pandemic lockdowns. And the story continues in Firestrike, where AMD’s Radeon VII – via KOMACHI_ENSAKA – only just loses out to Nvidia’s RTX 2080 by 27,587 to 27,853, respectively. You know the drill by now. So maybe see this as more what you’d call performance ‘guidelines’ than actual rock-solid performance figures. There’s not long to wait for the launch of AMD’s Radeon VII graphics card, the first gaming GPU of its kind on the 7nm process node. share. While the Radeon 7 is perfectly capable of hitting 60fps in most games here, which is all you really need if you only have a 60Hz monitor at your disposal, the RTX 2080 can often do so much more, making it a better fit for screens with higher refresh rates. AMD’s Radeon VII will launch on February 7, 2019, and you can delve much deeper into our AMD Radeon VII review for full, independent benchmarks once that day comes around. I admit I do find some of AMD’s assumptions to be a little slanted, though. Support our efforts! AMD’s competition has launched four current-gen GPUs since the fall, so its fans have understandably been anxious for a follow up to 2017’s RX Vega. Find more information here. For comparison’s sake, the 2080 Ti offers 0.42 TFLOPS of FP64 performance. I’m not convinced. Plenty to be tucking into. Also strange is that the marker is notches higher than the 11GB it references, exaggerating the differences a bit. This run is basically everything a benchmark shouldn’t be: inconsistent and unstable. On the topic of VRAM, AMD’s marketing push with this card hovers a lot around the importance of future-proofing ourselves with lots of memory. It’s truly useless. It’s going to be a solid option for most workloads, and now with increased FP64, it becomes a relative steal at $700 to those who need it. Do you really believe Black Ops 4 needs 12GB of VRAM? The move to 7nm helps AMD develop a GPU that’s more power efficient, but what fun would there be in releasing a product that only delivered the same performance, but at less power? Best PC games So I thought I’d take a closer look at how they both stack up again, this time via the medium of some lovely graphs, both at 4K across a variety of different graphics settings as well as what’s possible on max settings at 2560×1440. But not to ruin your Margarita with an over enthusiastic salting, it’s worth noting that, while there are evidently Radeon VII samples out in the wild, all drivers are pre-release and therefore performance is not necessarily final. ... 2060, RX 590 and Radeon VII are not included in that chart, I take it these weird groupings may have been this way for a while. To the bar charts! Deus Ex: Mankind Divided as-tested settings, Shadow of the Tomb Raider as-tested settings, Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands as-tested settings, AMD Unveils ‘Big Navi’ Graphics Cards: The 16GB RX 6800, RX 6800 XT & RX 6900 XT, Adobe Releases Slew Of Creative Cloud Updates, With AI Enhancements Found All Over, UL Releases 3DMark ‘Wild Life’ Test For Notebooks & Mobiles, OnePlus Unveils Its $749 8T Flagship: 120Hz Screen, 65W Charging & Quad Cameras, SPEC Releases SPECviewperf 2020, Sports Updated Tests & UX Improvements, Battlefield 1 - Techgage Tested Settings (1), Battlefield 1 - Techgage Tested Settings (2), Deus Ex Mankind Divided - Techgage Tested Settings (1), Deus Ex Mankind Divided - Techgage Tested Settings (2), Deus Ex Mankind Divided - Techgage Tested Settings (3), Forza Horizon 4 - Techgage Tested Settings, Monster Hunter World - Techgage Tested Settings (1), Monster Hunter World - Techgage Tested Settings (2), Rise of the Tomb Raider - Techgage Tested Settings (1), Rise of the Tomb Raider - Techgage Tested Settings (2), Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands - Techgage Tested Settings (1), Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands - Techgage Tested Settings (2), Gaming: Battlefield V, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, F1 2018 & Far Cry 5, Gaming: Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter, SotTR & Ghost Recon Wildlands, Synthetic: 3DMark, VRMark & Superposition. That said, there are still other cases where the RTX 2080 has the clear advantage, such as in Total War: Warhammer II, Final Fantasy XV (with all of the Nvidia effects turned off, I might add) and The Witcher III, where the RTX 2080 offers significantly smoother frame rates than the Radeon 7. 80% Upvoted. The numbers for the other Nvidia and AMD cards have come from our own testing results, with the Radeon VII benchmark numbers coming from the various leaks appearing today. To add to this, the night prior to this article’s embargo lift, AMD told us that it decided to increase the double-precision (FP64) performance on this card to twice what was previously announced – which was already twice what we were told after CES. What’s more, if you look at the graph for Medium 4K settings below (again omitting the games that were already pretty much at 60fps on High), you’ll find a similar story for Final Fantasy XV, too, with the Radeon 7 managing roughly the same speed on the game’s Average setting as the RTX 2080 did on High (and ditto again for Total War). We’re talking 1TB/s of available memory bandwidth, after all. Does Watch Dogs Legion contain a single NPC I could bear to hang out with? Below, you’ll see how they fare on 4K High settings, with the exception of Forza Horizon 4 as it was already well above the 60fps mark on Ultra. The Radeon VII trailed the RTX 2080 by 7 frames per second at 1440p, but that lead drops to only 3 FPS at 4K. It’s the “world’s first 7nm gaming” GPU, and with 16GB of VRAM, it’s one that’s built for high detail at high resolution. 39% of the 23 Games can be played at almost 4K with Sapphire TriXX BOOST. Net gaming capability is 91%. Also residing in the flurry of Radeon VII activity today – how suspicious – was Final Fantasy XV benchmark results. I’ll start with how it does at 4K, as that’s the main reason why you’d be buying one of these cards in the first place, but you’ll also find how they fare on max settings at 2560×1440 as well, because why not? The “VII” in Radeon VII represents the fact that the card is built using 7nm, and also that it’s a follow-up to the original Vega, which spawned RX Vega 56 and 64. Final Fantasy XV is still a bit of a tough nut on this setting, but if graphical fidelity matters more to you than the kind of frame rate you’re getting, then High is certainly doable on both the Radeon 7 and RTX 2080. A total of eight games are included in our current test suite. How many people need 300+ FPS in Siege, really? As our power testing will highlight later, AMD’s TDP spec doesn’t align with our real-world testing, but that’s a good thing, since VII draws a good deal less power than the Vega 64, despite its big performance boost, and having twice the amount of HBM2. save hide report. The Radeon 7 could bounce back if it ever drops from its launch price of £649 / $699, but right now, the £640+ / $710+ RTX 2080 is much better value for money. With VII being derived from Instinct, it feels to me like AMD was forced to a 16GB VRAM config, and now has to justify that reality through what I’d consider to be misleading marketing. Next time I’ll do better. 43% of the 23 Games can be played at almost 4K with Sapphire TriXX BOOST. Best Warzone loadout for Season 6. Support RPS and get an ad-free site, extra articles, and free stuff. Ultimately, it feels like AMD didn’t even know where to target this card, so it just decided to target it everywhere. The only game where the Radeon 7 actually comes out on top is Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, where its average benchmark score was just a single frame in front of its Nvidia rival. Tagged with AMD, AMD Radeon, feature, graphics cards, Hardware, Nvidia. It’s much better when we get far greater performance for the same power – or perhaps 5W more than RX Vega 64, as AMD’s spec sheet shows. With its “do everything” ambition, the Radeon VII is similar to NVIDIA’s TITAN series.