If you buy Vega 64 as a standalone card for $499, it's plenty fast for gaming purposes, and it's AMD's fastest graphics chip ever. It's at this point where Vega 64 reveals its core weakness against Nvidia's GeForce line. But for stock operation, where it's basically trading blows with the GTX 1080, how much does the increased power use really matter? You actually won’t see AMD playing this card up too much – AMD considers the air cooled Vega 64 to be their baseline – but for gamers who seek the best Vega possible, AMD has put together quite a stunner. The main protagonist of Final Fantasy 16 is called Clive, Digital FoundryAstro's Playroom on PS5: a brilliant introduction to the DualSense controller, Aragami and Lego Indiana Jones lead November's Xbox Games with Gold. One UK retailer suggested that AMD had offered internal rebates only on the first batch of cards, but whatever the politics are, lack of availability right now along with the continuing Ethereum mining boom sees Vega pricing often sitting at the midway point between GTX 1080 and GTX 1080 Ti. With fewer objects to process and fewer draw calls to pass through the driver, performance between AMD and Nvidia moves closer. If that's what you're after, wait for Vega 64 to get back to MSRP (or hold off for the Vega 56 at $399, which will also go out of stock at launch), and you're set. But have they matched Nvidia's GeForce drivers? More Reviews by josh norem. In the short term, that leaves the GTX 1080 Ti at the top of the heap with no effective competition, but in the longer term our concern is that continued lack of competition at the top-end could see the rate of progress begin to slow. AMD is back in the high-end GPU game with its all-new RX Vega GPUs. Blockchain technologies may not go away any time soon, but graphics cards need to be good at gaming first—otherwise, gamers go elsewhere, Nvidia increases its market share, and game developers begin to optimize even more for Nvidia over AMD. For more information, go here. headset is out of stock until further notice. Sign up to get the best content of the week, and great gaming deals, as picked by the editors. Cyberpunk 2077 delay necessary for last-minute work on current consoles, dev says. AMD's Radeon Software Crimson (and now ReLive) drivers have been good in my experience, with relatively few major problems. Intel Core i7-5930K @ 4.5GHz At most, then, the liquid card should be around 13 percent faster, but it might be more (or less) than that depending on whether you're willing to increase the default fan speeds. Never mind chasing down interesting odds & ends. Almost. https://t.co/YpmW6wb7wc. Please deactivate your ad blocker in order to see our subscription offer, We check over 130 million products every day for the best prices. The charts below are similar to those posted earlier this week, only now I've focused specifically on 1440p performance, and I've added benchmarks for several additional configurations of the RX Vega 64. PC Gamer is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Vega 64 can currently net around $3.30 per day, but after power costs it ends up at $2.60 in profit (nearly the same as GTX 1080). This chart compares the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. Now with a few more days with the Vega 64, I'm ready to issue a final verdict. By contrast, Nvidia's DX12 performance is occasionally slower than DX11 - a baffling state of affairs we've noticed in titles including BF1 and The Division. For DX12 and Vulkan games, AMD hardware performs great, often beating the Nvidia equivalents. Besides the potential need for a higher capacity PSU and improved airflow, it mostly comes down to power costs. The reasoning behind this is complex – I don’t think AMD knew if it could have Vega 56 samples ready, for a start – but ultimately boils down to AMD wanting to put their best foot forward. AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Today is AMD’s moment to shine, as for the first time in over a year, they are back in the high-end video card market. Based on our performance numbers, this is a claim that can be challenged easily enough as is, but within hours of Vega 64 going on sale, the price ratcheted up significantly. Cooler Master CM Storm Trooper Ashes of the Singularity and Hitman - games that historically favour AMD - fit the bill here, so it's not surprising to see the Vega 64 do well here, taking the lead over the 1080. Elsewhere, Vega 64 offers very similar performance to GTX 1080 overall, within margin of error on a couple of titles - Far Cry Primal and The Division. AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Review By Jimmy Thang on August 16, 2017 at 3:47PM PDT While AMD's 400 - and 500-series Polaris graphics card were great value GPUs, they were aimed at budget-conscious gamers. Switching to WattMan Power Saver drops power draw to 461W, while Turbo increases power draw to 518W. And right now, RX Vega 64 looks pretty mediocre, though I'd say the same for any GPU purchased for mining purposes right now. Windows 10 Pro 64-bit. Can they end Nvidia's reign? With Vega 64, this situation has changed: AMD has instead been forced to position the new product against the green team's second tier offering: GTX 1080. Receive news and offers from our other brands? The other attendees are not impressed. Regardless, it means that we’ve only had a very limited amount of time to evaluate the performance and architectural aspects of AMD’s new cards, and even less time to write about them. @dcominottim @Nadav14775497 @anandtech Sure, I can confirm it. It's difficult to point at any one area of Vega's architecture as the major culprit for the excessive power use. The figures here speak for themselves - it's difficult to avoid the sense that AMD has been required to push the Vega processor hard in order to match GTX 1080 and the end result is a spike in power consumption which does not look impressive compared to the competition, nor indeed compared to Vega 56. My benchmark suite and testbed remain the same as in previous GPU reviews, a high-end X99 build with a healthy overclock on the CPU. But for stock operation, where it's basically trading blows with the GTX 1080, how much does the increased power use really matter? Even with launch-day driver updates for games, new releases tend to favor Nvidia. © The HBM2 memory consistently failed above its rated speeds, while the core clock could only be pushed by an additional five per cent before the system crashed in the Crysis stress scene. That testing is only including CPU and RAM but other articles say my RX460 is about 104 watts during torture testing. Meanwhile, other games including Rise of the Tomb Raider and The Witcher 3 see GTX 1080 push ahead by around three to five per cent.