Learn … Learn more. I use another 8 core server myself for that though. I am considering the R5, it seems great value for the price, has multithreading and i can always swap it later for Zen+ or other subsequent cpus. A monitor is also in my bucket. People don't realize for people with large projects build times become quite a burden. AMD Zen Core Architecture. AMD 3700X @ 4200 1.312v | 32GB 3200cl16 | RTX2080Ti custom loop. Press J to jump to the feed. However it is generally not multithreaded, unless you're using a build system like Gradle and enable independent module compilation. /r/AMD is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless specified. AMD Ryzen™ 3 2200U Mobile Processor with Radeon™ Vega 3 Graphics. This chart compares the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U with the most popular Processors over the last 30 days. I am contemplating jumping on Ryzen but the r7 1700 is 350 euros , the jump will cost me ~700 euros, to get motherboard and 16gb ram. 3DMark score. I am using jetbrain's IDEs along with Photoshop\Illustrator. I am thinking of using that app Linus shows that share mouse and keyboard between devices and i could use my laptop temporarily until i get another monitor. In your case I don't think is worthy, keep the money. If I were you I would invest in peripherals, for example another monitor and ergonomic stuff. Ryzen is an excellent power horse for media encoding and rendering. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Edit: Also VM's. Also being casual gamer I find that Ryzen delivers on all fronts at a fair price. On March 19 the Intel i7-6900K retails for over $1000; twice the price of the equivalent AMD Ryzen 1800X. Edit: I am programming in Java, Python, C++ and Rust for Windows and Android. Even if the program is single threaded, you can test it 8x faster (at least in theory) if you have 8 cores each running their own instance of the program. Another JVM developer. Such a direct comparison is for a small segment of the CPU market. Some Python C module compilation can be sped up as well with multiple threads (but this is of less benefit unless you're testing script deployments). But it really depends on your use cases and how much of your software benefits from 16 threads. I am a programmer, i am sitting here with an i5 4590 and 16GB ddr3 ram. Android Studio also supports parallel compilation of independent modules. I am a programmer, i am sitting here with an i5 4590 and 16GB ddr3 ram. Probably not worth it because programming means you are likely spending most of your time in a code editor which doesn't need that much heft :-) Unless you do a lot of compiling too and the time taken bugs you no end. Close. Improved energy efficiency, higher clock speeds and more cores than ever before. Then again, selenium is probably the bottleneck there. If you tend to run a lot of VMs, use things like Vagrant (with lots of VMs) then it's a no brainer. You may also want to consider the cheaper 6c/12t R5 1600 if you are in doubt as to whether you will need 8 cores. By worth it I am thinking you mean build times. C++ and Rust compilation can benefit from Ryzen 7's many threads (you have to use a flag when compiling). The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. Not worth it, unless you specifically need more cores for some reason, which I am pretty sure you don't, it's not worth it. Dual FE, e5-1650v3,x99-e WS10g 128G Epyc/TR soon! Archived. I'm gonna guess you program in Java (it's the most common in Jetbrains IDEs, but please correct me if I'm wrong). Whether that makes it worth it I'm not sure. However most of the time you need to iteratively compile one module (the one you're working on) so the benefit of multiple cores is limited. Edit: Thanks for all the help guys! I am programming in Java, Python, C++ and Rust. Highest score: 13451. AMD SenseMI Technology. Not that i can think of. I'm just gonna come out and say it. You have no idea what your talking about. If you run virtual machines, databases, containers, IDEs, compilations, CI pipelines etc tasks then more cores is always better. C++ compiles into machine code, while Java compiles into object code. I will add it to the main post but the issues are Android Emulation and Android SDK is godawful. Or a project to index? With an fast connection, M2 drive and 32gb, docker build containers and VirtualBox vagrant environments are up way way quicker, integration tests are up to server speeds. Ryzen + Programming performance. Thank you though. Your mileage will vary. As a developer I run half a dozen VM's for different servers I use as a prod analog. So here i am asking, is the jump difference worth it for a programmer ? What are your current build times? How many VMs do you run? The only CPU intensive task when programming is compiling the code, but Java doesn't work like C++ or other languages, you don't compile the code to an executable per se, Java compiles and optimizes the code at runtime, so you don't really need a beast PC to save time on compilation. C++ seems boosted a ton, but not as fast as on X99 (quad channel and also expensive 6c12t options available). Having more cores for really affordable price, like the R7 1700 was a no brainer to me. Overal, much smoother experience than say on my 4790 non K machine with 32gb. I am contemplating jumping on Ryzen but the r7 1700 is 350 euros , the jump will cost me ~700 euros, to get motherboard and 16gb ram. You should research the build environments you will use and check. Scala compiles a lot faster for me, publish locals are twice as fast. Posted by u/[deleted] 3 years ago. Fellow Java programmer here. Technologies. Your wrong there the Jetbrains IDE does a lot fo code indexing so i find that to use lots of CPU. Intel i7700 would be half the price and more suited for single core performace. Discussion. I would say more cores generally is good for distributed builds. Share this page. Discussion. It sure looks to me like AMD has jumped way ahead of Intel in CPUs for programmers. Having more cores can also speed up automated testing. I'm using JetBrains as well, is there a particular project you'd like me to build to compare? With AMD SenseMI technology, Ryzen™ processors use true machine intelligence to help accelerate performance. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, R7 2700X | 32GB 2933 CL12 | RX Vega 56 | Thinkpad E495 R7 3700U, Ryzen 3950x+Vega64 Liquid.. awaiting BigNavi, R7 1700@3.7 1.26V|2xRX 580 4GB|8GB 3200CL16/2T/60ProODT. Is the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U good value for money? Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Threadripper, EPYC, Navi, the next-gen consoles, news, rumours, show-off your build and more. I will be getting an R5 1600 non x and upgrade later down the road and put the 1600 cpu on a server or a sibling's computer. There are other price points where Intel still beats AMD; ultra servers, low end servers, and laptops. I have noticed indexing is a lot faster in general. As far as the Ryzen 3 processors are concerned, this is the same 8-core die used in the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 configurations, only with two cores … Java compilation can take a long time as well. Open shopping cart. 25. I would say that it would be overkill for your needs. HP Pavilion 15 AMD Ryzen 3 2200U 4GB 1TB 15.6-inch Radeon Vega 3 Graphics Windows 10 Laptop (Renewed) $384.99: Get the deal: Lenovo - 330S-15ARR 15.6" Laptop - AMD R... Lenovo - 330S-15ARR 15.6" Laptop - AMD Ryzen 5 - 8GB Memory - 128GB Solid State Drive - Platinum Gray: $619.00: Get the deal : AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlock... AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlocked … Really appreciate it. The mem bandwidth is pretty great too. R7 1700 is a no brainer, it's a delight to work with. For my build environment it helps a lot having more cores and I offload it to a 8 core machine. Ryzen + Programming performance . New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Price.